gymn Digest                 Sun, 11 Dec 94       Volume 3 : Issue  44

Today's Topics:
                                 ...
                               Amy Chow
                    Australia and World's (2 msgs)
                Cheers for the USA Women ... (4 msgs)
                Cheers for the USA Women Team (2 msgs)
                      Dortmond worlds report #1
                      Dortmond Worlds Report #2
                         Gym Stars Order Form
                             Kerri Strug
                    n.c.'s visit to rom with b.c.
                          Plans for Shannon?
       Qualifying Into Dortmund (was Re: Australia and World's)
                      Shannon's tremendous gift
                     shannon fiasco.... (2 msgs)
                       Shannon Miller (2 msgs)
                                Temple
                           US Mens Program

This is a digest of the gymn@athena.mit.edu mailing list. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Dec 1994 20:08:23 -0500
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: ...

>underrated forgotten gymnast of the week: Irina Baraksanova

For this week:

Antje Wilkenloh



Mara

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 21:31:03 -0500
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Amy Chow

>What was going on with Amy Chow (I must have missed a post)? 

Amy had some serious first-Worlds' jitters.  She was shaky during
compulsories, then fell on her last compulsory event, bars.  in prelimirary
optionals the jitters got worse, and she fell from bars, beam (3 times), was
shaky on floor, and sat down both vaults.

During finals, though, the US put one of her coaches on the floor with her
(Nunno and Tracy had been on the floor during compos, Akopian and Hill during
prelim optionals).  She hit all four events (slightly shaky bars) and seemed
to gain more confidence after each one. 

Mara

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 03:44:14 -0500
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Australia and World's

>Because this was a team event only they selected the teams from how they
placed their regional championships.  Australia is not a part of any of the
regional championships, and thus did not have an opportunity >to qualify. 

Didn't some of the teams qualify from how they placed at Indy (and/or
Barcelona)?  When Adriana reported the North America qualifier for men, she
had said that the US & Canada didn't have to qualify.  Also, I don't recall
hearing anything about qualifying for women.

Since Australia finished 7th in Barcelona and 6th in Indy for the women, I'm
surprised they wren't pre-qualified.

Mara

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 08:47:41 -0500 (EST)
From: ***@minerva.cis.yale.edu>
Subject: Australia and World's

> Didn't some of the teams qualify from how they placed at Indy (and/or
> Barcelona)?  When Adriana reported the North America qualifier for men, she
> had said that the US & Canada didn't have to qualify.  Also, I don't recall
> hearing anything about qualifying for women.
>
> Since Australia finished 7th in Barcelona and 6th in Indy for the women, I'm
> surprised they wren't pre-qualified.
>
> Mara
>

Quick correction: the qualifier was for all of the Americas and only the
US didn't have to qualify (Canada did).

If Australia didn't go because they weren't part of any regional
qualifier, that is the most absurd thing I have ever heard.  How did this
happen?  Where was Australia months ago when they were figuring out who
would go?  Somehow, I find it hard to believe Australia would just sit
back and not say anything, but I find it even harder to believe that if they
did say something, the FIG would say, sorry, you can't prequalify or
compete in any qualifier.

:)
Adriana

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 07:37:12 -0500
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Cheers for the USA Women ...

Nobody did.  I was referring to the booing that Shannon received.  I know the
audience was booing at the score but they should have thought about how
Shannon would have felt.  I know that although I know they were booing the
score, the jeers are directed towards the athlete in a way and can affect
them psychologically.---Brian

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 08:51:50 -0500 (EST)
From: ***@minerva.cis.yale.edu
Subject: Cheers for the USA Women ...

> Nobody did.  I was referring to the booing that Shannon received.  I know the
> audience was booing at the score but they should have thought about how
> Shannon would have felt.  I know that although I know they were booing the
> score, the jeers are directed towards the athlete in a way and can affect
> them psychologically.---Brian

Ah, I understand what you mean.  I thought you were talking about Gymn. 
Did it really seem like the booing was directed at Shannon?  Booing has
always seemed to me to be directed at the judges, but on the other hand,
I don't seem to recall any booing for *overscoring* ever, and maybe that
changes how it comes off.

:)
Adriana

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 22:40:19 -0500
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Cheers for the USA Women ...

Yeah I don't recall either any competition where overscoring was booed.  Only
underscoring (at least at times when the audience thought it was underscoring
when it was correct or over i.e. Barcelona.)  I don't know whether or not
they would boo Shannon but regardless.  It probably affected her some.  I
doubt she's ever been booed in her career.---Brian

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 22:32:08 -0700 (MST)
From: ***@asu.edu
Subject: Cheers for the USA Women ...

>  I doubt she's ever been booed in her career.---Brian
>


Well, she wasn't being booed.  The judges were being booed.  She's not
six years old, I'm sure she knows it.  She made several glaring errors
that were virtually ignored, at the expense of all the other athletes. 
Can we move on to something else please? 

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 03:44:58 -0500
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Cheers for the USA Women Team

>      I know lots of people are surprised that the US took silver,
and maybe a little angry.  The fact is the US girls did a great job. 

I do have to agree that the US Women deserved the silver. 

They were in a rather unfortunate situation (morale-wise, etc.), particularly
Amy Chow, and pulled together very well.  Yes, the Russians and the Chinese
had opportunities to take the silver, but problems on BB (Russia) and vault
(China) kept them from capitalizing.  That's why they call it a competition.
]

Incidentally, I don't think the US Women were overscored in finals.  They had
*definitely* been overscored in compulsories, but after the UB fiasco, the
judges seemed overly careful not to overscore the US in optionals or finals.
 

Mara

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 8:08:52 PST
From: ***@sol.metaware.com
Subject: Cheers for the USA Women Team

> I do have to agree that the US Women deserved the silver. 
>
> They were in a rather unfortunate situation (morale-wise, etc.), particularly
> Amy Chow, and pulled together very well.  Yes, the Russians and the Chinese
> had opportunities to take the silver, but problems on BB (Russia) and vault
> (China) kept them from capitalizing.  That's why they call it a competition.

What was going on with Amy Chow (I must have missed a post)? 

--Robin

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Dec 1994 00:09:57 -0500
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Dortmond worlds report #1

>beam.Perhaps the results might have
> been differ
> ent had Svetlanta Ivanova not been injured.

Svetlana Ivanova did compete, for Bulgaria.  Natasha Ivanova for Russia was
the one who broke her foot.

Mara

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Dec 1994 20:22:00 -0500
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Dortmond Worlds Report #2

>-Scherbo was in the best shape I've seen since Barcelona.Did the same
sets as in Brisbane,but looked much sharper.

More importantly, he's actually learned how to play nice with others!

>-Elena Piskun was the best all around gymnast there(IMHO).

While I didn't think she was the best all-arounder there (that honor would
have to go to Pod, IMHO), Piskun's floor just gets better and better and
better...

Mara

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 29 Nov 1994 14:09:04 -0700 (MST)
From: ***@asu.edu
Subject: Gym Stars Order Form

rah rah the Mogilny is cool

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 94 18:37 PST
From: ***@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU
Subject: Kerri Strug

Kerri Strug has signed a letter of intent to attend UCLA after the
1996 Olympics...

Oh Joy!

I wonder which gymnast she'll imitate here... hopefully Stella...



Brett

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 01 Dec 94 15:45:57 EST
From: ***@email.cfr.org
Subject: n.c.'s visit to rom with b.c.

Well, since it's rather slow, what the heck....some news about Nadia's visit
to Romania from Reuters World Service:

-Large crowds, kids "chanting" "Nadia, Nadia,..."..

-Visits with President, Prime Minister, Orthodox Church Patriarch.

-On the catwalk of fashion show in white fur coat while the newly rich watched.

-Visit to Onesti, "Nadia, Nadia,...etc.", renaming of old gym with her name.

-Engagement with B. Conner blessed in an Orthodox ceremony at Deva
 training center with Romanian national team in attendance.

All or some of the above (described as "well scripted" in one report) has been
capture by ABC to be broadcast in the spring.

I hope I've not pained anyone *too* much with this post...

Connie

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Dec 1994 01:27:22 -0500
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Plans for Shannon?

Has anyone heard any info on whether or not Shannon intends to take a break
from competition for awhile and learn new skills, let her injuries heal and
rest up?  I really hope both she and Steve are smart about this.  This next
year will really make or break Shannon in terms of her being peaked and
prepared for Atlanta or being burned out by that time and to tired and/or
injured to compete.  Anybody have any thoughts on this subject?---Brian

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 15:44:48 -0500
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Qualifying Into Dortmund (was Re: Australia and World's)

Teams were automatically qualified into Dortmund if they were part of the
Barcelona Olympics. Therefore the Austrailian Women *did* have a bye but the
men did not. The women's team, according to their federation, was "not ready
for competition at this time." They (meaning Australia) *did* have a men's
team set to go but the FIG "forgot" them in the continental (not regional)
qualifiers.

Originally Dortmund was supposed to be a "small" worlds featuring only the
very top teams but the breakup of the Soviet Union (and a few other factors)
made them re-think their strategy many times over (and it showed in their
complete & total disorganization ... I've seen regional meets run with more
effort).

-Susan
------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 03:46:14 -0500
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: Shannon's tremendous gift

>What was truly embarrassing more than the score was Steve's blatant joy
over the score.  Throwing his arms up in triumph was a bit beyond what most
of the people sitting around me could handle.

The interesting thing that got overlooked two nights later was that *this*
score made the difference between the US Women finishing preliminaries in 2nd
or in 4th, as less then 0.1 separated the US, China and Russia after
preliminaries (C & O).

Mara

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 1994 23:03:33 -0500
From: ***@wam.umd.edu
Subject: shannon fiasco....

Could someone provide some clarification on this 'over scoring' of
shannon's comp bar routine....what is the max one can lose on an'
extra swing and where whould this have put her score for a max or
min reduction...were there any other flaws in the the routine??

thanks

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Dec 1994 20:21:39 -0500
From: ***@aol.com
Subject: shannon fiasco....

>Could someone provide some clarification on this 'over scoring' of
shannon's comp bar routine....what is the max one can lose on an'
extra swing and where whould this have put her score for a max or
>min reduction...were there any other flaws in the the routine??

>From what I observed, the issue is that the judges deducted only for an extra
swing, while the control judges (whose scores does not count) and just about
everyone else felt there was substantially more to deduct.  Let me explain:

Shannon was doing a beautiful routine until the last 4 moves (hecht to high
bar, kip cast to handstand, giant, tucked Comaneci dismount).  She only
caught the high bar on the tips of her fingernails on the hecht, and this set
her a bit off casting into the handstand.  She did the giant, and then she
balked out of the toe-on and dropped to a dead hang.  She then did another
kip cast to handstand, giant, and Comaneci dismount to complete the set.

Here was the controversy. 

-The judges view was that since her toes did not actually touch the bar, she
did not begin the dismount.  Also, Jackie Fie stated that the rules allowed
her to go back up to three moves to regain her rhythm. 

-The "three moves to regain momentum" are allowed after a miss or fall (in
fact the example Fie used was a man falling off high bar!), but the judges
essentially were claiming there was no miss or fall. 

-Logic would argue that if there was no miss or fall she would not get to
repeat the three moves.

As a side argument, IMHO Shannon's error was essentially a fall while still
holding on to the bar, in the same way that a gymnast can say, be way off on
a move on BB, grab the beam and not actually fall off, but still get deducted
almost for a fall.

To the judges out there, I would love to hear your thoughts (publicly or
privately) on the above.

Mara

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 29 Nov 94 18:05 PST
From: ***@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU
Subject: Shannon Miller

Shannon Miller is no longer a gymnast but a corporation.

Too bad she doesnt seem to own any shares.

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 29 Nov 1994 23:18:14 -0500 (EST)
From: ***@db.erau.edu
Subject: Shannon Miller

I totaly agree with this view.  the worst part is that I "work" for the
corpation and no one has  control over the machine. I am now looking for
other ways to work in the sport of gymnastics without being totaly
reliant on Dynmo.  Any Hints, job leads, offers?

Jaye "Jimmy Olsen" Howell

On Tue, 29 Nov 1994, Brett wrote:

>
>
> Shannon Miller is no longer a gymnast but a corporation.
>
> Too bad she doesnt seem to own any shares.
>

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 1 Dec 1994 12:38:48 +1000
From: ***@pharm.med.upenn.edu
Subject: Temple

I am making this post with the heaviest of hearts.

Temple has decided, today, to drop men and women's gymnastics and baseball.
 The programs will end on June 30, 1995.

I received the phone call from Fred (Turoff) this morning and heard it has
now been announced on our local radio around 11 am this morning.  In the
near future I will be posting information on the possibilities of saving
these programs. 

Right now the men are getting ready to compete in the UMass open at Amherst
- the competion is Sat. at 7PM - Michigan, Syracuse, Southern Conn, MIT,
UVM, Temple, Penn State will be competing for the team title and on Sunday
individuals will compete in comps at 11am for qualifying to Nationals.
Anyone who lives in the area - please come out and show support for men's
gymnastics - These men has worked all of their lives and it is being taken
away from them in one day .

Thank you for your time and hopefully your caring.

Mayland

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 30 Nov 94 10:54 PST
From: ***@MVS.OAC.UCLA.EDU
Subject: US Mens Program

Ok, this is a topic that has been bothering me for a while now...

The US Mens team seems to get a lot of crap from a lot of people concerning
their placings in int'l competitons...  Yes, it is true, the US Men are not
terribly close to challenging for a medal in team competitions... now get
over it..

THe US Mens should be appreciated for the placings they do win.. THere is
nothing wrong with placing in the top 10 in the world.  I'm sure in 1991, the
Italian team was very well respected in Italy for placing 7th. Over here, they
would be castrated.  Great Britian was ecstatic that they
qualified for the Olympics in 92, why can't we be the same way?

Ever since the McOlympics of 1984, we seem to have this obsession with placing
1st, with being the best etc...  Its a sort of mis-channeled patriotism that
keeps us from appreciating the gymnasts we do have.  Let us remember that
gymnastics is not really much of a priority among young kids (esp boys) in
the US.  John Rothlesberger (sp) got some crap from people when he
exclaimed in frustration that we had some fine athletes in the mens program.  I
 can partly understand his frustration, they are doing a strong level of
gymnastics but getting reamed for not winning.  WHats up with that?

Thats all for now....

Brett


------------------------------

End of gymn Digest
******************************